Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camila Finn
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:14, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Camila Finn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Long-term undersourced BLP of questionable notability. The WordsmithCommunicate 06:58, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 07:39, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Appears to be a top Brazilian supermodel, Ford Supermodel of the Year in 2005, and ranked #2 by Vogue among all Ford models, many many news sources show notability, I quickly put some URL refs in the article for examples.--Milowent • talkblp-r 15:59, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. —Hoary (talk) 00:04, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:19, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- keep per Milowent. Is now well-sourced. JoshuaZ (talk) 04:10, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:45, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - the sorucing added to the article since the nomination provides sufficient coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 17:14, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.