Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camryn Rogers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 12:46, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Camryn Rogers

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

qualified to represent Canada is not the same as actually representing Canafa. DGG ( talk ) 10:13, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:31, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:31, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep With respect, winning the Canadian national championship - twice as far as I can see - and breaking a collegiate record - as well as national coverage that would appear to get her past WP:GNG - seems to me to be a keeper... Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:32, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:55, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Whew, that article is in bad shape, but the subject meets WP:NCOLLATH under multiple points, having won the NCAA championship twice and breaking a collegiate record. Kncny11 ^(shoot) 17:11, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Twice NCAA champion, set two NCAA records, Canadian champion, world under-20 champion, #4 in the world this year, and there is significant coverage going back to at least 2018 from reliable sources. Jozape (talk) 21:18, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clearly competing at a notable level of the sport, winning top level national and international events, which has received sufficient third party coverage. SFB 00:44, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:NCOLLATH. Article needs work though. ExRat (talk) 08:19, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.