Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlisle Golf and Country Club
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 08:56, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Carlisle Golf and Country Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete. This page read like an ad, it was all promotional fluff. When that fluff was removed it was too bare to warrant an article. Seems to not meet notability standards. Delete! Locochoko (talk) 11:45, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - No sources or notability since February 2009. Analog Horror, (Speak) 21:46, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 March 17. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:54, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:59, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:00, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:00, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Golf clubs and country clubs, even large ones with 27 holes, are run of the mill. I don't see anything special about this one, and nothing to show it passes WP:GNG. The "awards" it got are merely listings by unreliable sources. Bearian (talk) 00:18, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.