Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Civilization One (band)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Civilization One (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No third party sources, appears to fail WP:MUSIC. Durova360 06:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 11:02, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment.Weak keep. These [1][2] are the best I could dig up,not sure if that's enough to pass WP:MUSIC.agreed that this is just enough to satisfy WP:BAND. Gongshow Talk 18:35, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Weak Keep per above finds by Gongshow. Appears to just meet criterion 1 of wp:band.--Epeefleche (talk) 22:05, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Modest Keep Meeting criterion 1 still meets WP:BAND. Thanks to Gongshow for finding sources. The singer has been part of other notable bands, though his BLP needs some clean-up. delirious & lost ☯ TALK 22:05, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak-ever-so-close-to-speedy-delete Keep. Satisfies WP:BAND.----Boeing7107isdelicious|SPRiCh miT meineN PiloteN 05:10, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 04:16, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The references provided by Gongshow were just incorporated into the article. They're WP:N. J04n(talk page) 05:12, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Kudos for, as always, adding refs to the article itself. You're doing a great job.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:37, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed, thanks J04n. Nice work! Gongshow Talk 01:40, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yep, keep it per above sources. TheWeakWilled (T * G) 23:54, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.