Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cohen@Mushon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 22:26, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cohen@Mushon

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Barely any coverage. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:MUSICBIO. No fans, no social media, no plays. scope_creep^Talk 11:31, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:34, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:34, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 16:11, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:46, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - Sorry I can't give a stronger vote on this, but there may be enough notice for a brief stub article on this group. Three of the footnotes currently in the article are to fairly robust profiles in a publication called Mako that appears to be a somewhat reliable music source in their country. Also note that very little comes up with a search of "Cohen@Mushon", but a search via the Hebrew spelling ("כהן@מושון") brings up some more media sources from their country in their own language, showing that they have been noticed as a hip-hop act from an unlikely location. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:55, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~*Keep~~ I added a couple of sources, more material came up in search. ~~Seems to suffice.~~NotButtigieg (talk) 16:09, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just released his debut album, all indicative of being non-notable. scope_creep^Talk 17:58, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One is press release about Michael Cohen, not Cohen@Mushon and the other one about Cohen, so neither is about Cohen@Mushon. scope_creep^Talk 18:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neither is a press release, both are signed news articles about one of the duo that ran in reputable news papers with brief mentions of this duo. There is more coverage like this: [1]. Coverage can be brief but still be coverage. NotButtigieg (talk) 19:32, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~What an abusive message.~~ Coverage that is brief is not coverage. scope_creep^Talk 19:58, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

<Abusive? seriously?NotButtigieg (talk) 20:09, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

After perusing the Hebrew material, I suggest that this musical duo be discussed on the pages of each of the two performers.NotButtigieg (talk) 20:09, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Having looked at 1000's of press releases over the last 5 years over 100's of articles, as part of NPP and AFC, COI and SPAM, you get to be very good at recognising what is a press release and what isn't. That last ref again is a name drop. It not coverage sufficient to satisfy WP:MUSICBIO. Its a mention. scope_creep^Talk 20:17, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.