Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Continental Airlines Flight 1760
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 19:50, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Continental Airlines Flight 1760 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable incident. A plane lands at the wrong airport. Worth a note in an airline article maybe but not a whole article. William 15:57, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. -William 16:01, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. -William 16:01, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -William 16:01, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, doesn't seem worthy of mention in anything, unless we create a group of "List of NTSB incidents in [year]" articles. Nyttend (talk) 18:40, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and burn with fire. Utter failure of WP:GNG and doesn't even meet WP:AIRCRASH criteria for one paragraph in a type article. - The Bushranger One ping only 20:43, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:GNG rather badly, as well as WP:AIRCRASH. Seems like a pretty minor incident. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 21:18, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:AIRCRASH (no fatalities; aircraft wasn't written off; no subsequent precedural changes). --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 04:03, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.