Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Croman Heliport

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Croman Corporation. MBisanz ^talk 08:46, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Croman Heliport

Fails WP:N and WP:RS. Just like the others. The sources listed are directory listings which do not establish notability. Delete or merge to Croman Corporation. Undead Warrior (talk) 04:23, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- Undead Warrior (talk) 04:23, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. -- Undead Warrior (talk) 04:23, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A heliport is not so notable. I get the picture of someone looking for a place to land his helicopter while the co-pilot has a laptop and is searching WP to find a heliport. Redddogg (talk) 05:36, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Croman Corporation--Trashbag (talk) 17:14, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of private-use airports in Oregon instead. It's not notable enough for its own article, but it is useful to have a list of airports in the region, famous or otherwise. Squidfryerchef (talk) 02:53, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Croman Corporation. I'd oppose merging to the list as the list is a table and it would give undue weight to a single entry. Katr67 (talk) 14:00, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, what i really meant was, blank the page and redirect to the list, one row on the list with a link to a map is plenty weight, and replace the link to the blanked page with a link to Croman Corporation. Squidfryerchef (talk) 21:55, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Croman Corporation. Non-notable on its own. --Dual Freq (talk) 21:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.