Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyber Slam (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ^Complex/_Rational 17:59, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cyber Slam

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doubtful notability. Short-lived enterprise that I don't think meets WP:ORG. Some of the events it held got a flutter of media mentions, but the organisation itself certainly didn't get WP:SIGCOV. Article has been orphaned for a decade. PepperBeast (talk) 15:42, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Australia. PepperBeast (talk) 15:42, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete None of the sources are reliable; most are primary. I can't find mention of this outfit. Oaktree b (talk) 17:24, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Most sources are primary, as stated by Oaktree b. Doesn't seem notable. Also feels a bit like it was written by Cyber Slam members themselves, with "unfortunately" and such being used a lot. Strong delete. No sources, and last AfD was improperly closed. Was also nominated for PROD but IP removed it. 🌶️Jala peño🌶️ Don't click this link! 10:49, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And there's also major mentions of "ShauningtoN", called "an active member of the community", ensuring that this is a niche community that doesn't really belong on Wikipedia. I don't know how YouTube managed to stay as a big source for this page for over a decade. 🌶️Jala peño🌶️ Don't click this link! 10:51, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacking reliable sources to meet GNG. LibStar (talk) 23:28, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; can't find anything independent to source AviationFreak💬 19:46, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.