Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dance Dance Revolution Disney Grooves

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Dance Dance Revolution video games per ATD and CHEAP. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:25, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dance Dance Revolution Disney Grooves

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:GNG which says we need significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. Besides IGN's review [1] and press release [2] (which does not contribute to GNG as it comes from Konami itself and it thus WP:PRIMARY), I am not able to find anything else. The article included a reference from a forum (posted by some eddie) which is unreliable. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 14:40, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 15:58, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As should be done with most of the DDR articles (and Beatmania too). Only a few games are notable independently. Redirect would also be fine. TarkusAB^talk 16:44, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Dance Dance Revolution video games. The game does not appear to be independently notable enough for a standalone article, as the one IGN review included as a reference appears to be the only review that was written by a reliable third party source. However, the game is a valid search term that should redirect to the main list of DDR games. 169.232.162.112 (talk) 17:27, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment TarkusAB I agree, though it is ironic something actually notable like Dance Dance Revolution Universe got redirected to the list of all games article (I just restored it with a rewrite and addition of many reviews of the game), but this survived for some odd reason. I would be fine with a redirect I guess. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:07, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.