Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Blanco
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Wifione Message 07:41, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Daniel Blanco (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication that this football player has played in a professional match and fails WP:GNG. Cloudz679 22:07, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Cloudz679 22:14, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Mattythewhite (talk) 02:38, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]- Keep. Per Sir Sputnik. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:30, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 14:03, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. -- Joaquin008 (talk) 21:50, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Playerhistory confirm 47 apearances in the Cypriot First Division, which listed and sourced at WP:FPL. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:49, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:42, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Sir Sputnik. Player has played matches in the Cypriot First Division, which is the official highest-ranked national football league or division in Cyprus. Therefore, he does meet WP:NFOOTBALL. - Jorgath (talk) (contribs) 05:14, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Sir Sputnik. Very good point that should override all of the previous !votes. --Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 21:23, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Sir Sputnik. The info on how he is notable should somehow be added to the article. Mentoz86 (talk) 19:35, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.