Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniela de Jesus Cosio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience ^t 01:05, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Daniela de Jesus Cosio

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She exists, but that is about all the many refs tell us. Nothing reliable or substantial conveying any notability. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:00, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep there's in-depth coverage here, here, here, here, here. And she is among the 10 Modelos latinas más famosas en la industria de la moda (10 most famous Latina models in the fashion industry). Kraxler (talk) 17:11, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Swarm ♠ 23:59, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 20:57, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I'm not an expert or fan of fashion although I speak Spanish, these sources seem acceptable enough. SwisterTwister talk 05:22, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.