Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Reiss (fashion retailer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Listed for 14 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:31, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

David Reiss (fashion retailer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person with biographical references. Article and references does not indicate notability. Preferably redirect to Reiss (brand) if possible. E Wing (talk) 05:47, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep Definitely notable as shown in the article as this cited statement shows; the last big owner-founder entrepreneur left in British retail. I have converted the inline html references to inline citations. There are plenty more references to be found using Google News or Nexis that assert his notability from RS such as the Times, Telegraph, Independent and industry magazines. The blog by his nephew is a dubious source but as it is used for non controversial family history probably acceptable. I cam across this on new article patrol and am frankly baffled as to why it has been nominated here as the sources were already in the article. It could do with more work to improve the style but there should be no question of deletion. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:06, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems to be notable. ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:09, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW (Talk) 15:39, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 06:27, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 06:28, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 06:36, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Not sure why this was even relisted. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 09:58, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.