Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dee (actress)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 22:40, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dee (actress)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails pornbio and gng. The NYT source doesnt even mention this subject.... Was deprodded without improvement or proper explanation. Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:06, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:49, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:50, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:50, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:50, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:PORNBIO with only award nominations. Any claims of being in an iconic, groundbreaking or blockbuster feature need acknowledgements by reliable sources. Comes up short on WP:GNG. Only non-trivial coverage appears to come from Adult Video News. • Gene93k (talk) 22:25, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per prod rationale - Shouldn't of been deprodded, Obviously fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 19:26, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the logic of my original PROD, which was disruptively removed. Note that being in a purportedly iconic, groundbreaking, or blockbuster release is not sufficient to satisfy PORNBIO 2, which requires "unique contributions" to the genre, such as "starring in" such a release, not merely appearing in it, and that satisfying PORNBIO on this point requires reliable sourcing, not merely editor's opinions. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 20:03, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.