Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhakota Williams

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Carl Williams (criminal). Clear consensus against a standalone article; I'm unconvinced by the only argument opposing a merger, as the only content that could be merged is reasonably biographic for the father. Vanamonde (Talk) 21:37, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dhakota Williams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Majority the linked sources are all 1 source in actuality (News Corp media), and are generally sensationalised and/or not encyclopedic for wikipedia. This BLP only has association with Carl Williams (criminal), which is all the subject is known for. There is no other source or media that demonstrates independent notability. Tytrox (talk) 11:04, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 16:47, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 21:29, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per WP:NOTINHERITED. Not convinced by the merge !votes, as there is no relevance between her and her late father other than biology. I don't think it's appropriate for her to have a section or paragraph on that page and I wouldn't suggest a redirect either. At this time, she isn't really notable in her own right so I don't think it warrants any kind of article. Bungle (talkcontribs) 20:32, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.