Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Direct-to-film printing
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Procedural keep. Blocked sock nomination; no prejudice to re-nomination properly by an editor who knows what they're doing. (non-admin closure) Nate • (chatter) 00:22, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Direct-to-film printing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Paid for spam. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Fhektii (talk) 08:32, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts and Fashion. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:45, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to screen printingThis is clearly someone inventing a term/business line for something that already exists but huckstering someone who doesn't know the proper term. Nate • (chatter) 18:48, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Part of a series of inexplicable nominations by a blocked sock, so I rescind my vote on those grounds and with be NAC'ing as the article is in good faith and deserves a chance to be expanded. Nate • (chatter) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Procedural Comment This is one of a series of deletions started by a brand new account that has now been blocked as a sockpuppet. See [1]. Not sure if a procedural close is in order. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:32, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Redirect per MrSchimpf. Seems like an invented topic. 84.146.2.66 (talk) 11:32, 7 March 2024 (UTC) — 84.146.2.66 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.Blocked sock. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 21:30, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.