Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dua-e Ahad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:53, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dua-e Ahad

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non notable prayer from Shia Islam. Akin to creating an article on "God Bless" as a christian prayer. Perhaps a merger in some other Shia related article, but in any case it cannot warrant a stand alone article. Regards FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 05:10, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 07:55, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 07:55, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The supplication of allegiance to Muhammad al-Mahdi or Dua-e Ahad is notable topic and notable prayer for Shia Muslims. Notability requires only the existence of suitable independent and reliable sources, not their immediate presence or citation in an article. Editors evaluating notability should consider not only any sources currently named in an article, but also the possibility or existence of notability-indicating sources that are not currently named in the article. Thus, before nominating the article for deletion based on notability in a deletion discussion, editors are strongly encouraged to attempt to find sources for the subject in question and consider the possibility of existent sources if none can be found by a search. The absence of sources or citations in an article (as distinct from the non-existence of sources) does not indicate that a subject is not notable (NEXIST). If your suggestion is to merge of the article, is not need to nominate the article for delete. You can add merge tag to article and say your reason in the talk page. Please search more and ask expert user in this field as (Sa.vakilian). Saff V. (talk) 11:08, 18 November 2015 (UTC) [reply]

— Note to closing admin: Saff V. (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 13:27, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

First of all you should not ping users to a debate only based upon the fact that they share your POV. It is WP:CANVASS. You yourself admit that at present the article has ZERO reliable sources, but you claim that such sources do exist. Well! be kind enough to link them so I can add them to the article, because you must know where they exist as you are so vehement in your claim about them. Otherwise the claim of it being non notable remains valid I think Regards FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 13:50, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:54, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:38, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - notable prayer for Shias; admins should note OP is nominating many articles from same editor —Мандичка^YO 😜 10:16, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you can "provide sources" which say that this is "notable"? With such vehement verbal support from you, it must have been mentioned in depth by some reliable sources. Also, is the creator a demigod to you or something that his articles should not be nominated for deletion. Regards FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 04:54, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It's a notable Shia prayer. Mhhossein (talk) 16:01, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.