Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eastmaninstitutet
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. T. Canens (talk) 04:12, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Eastmaninstitutet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable place. I only found reviews, mirror sites, and Facebook pages. Koridas 📣 22:04, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:27, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:27, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment - I don't think this is a run-of-the-mill dental clinic, based on [1], [2], and [3]. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 22:40, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: The institute has an article in Swedish encyclopedia Nationalencyklopedin. The building has the second-highest degree of listing, "green". (As for the listing, see Swedish Wikipedia article. The listing is not terribly significant in itself. It is a nice early modernist building with interior wall-paintings by Einar Forseth, but there are actually many other buildings in Central Stockholm that are listed as green. To put it in some kind of context, the Stockholm Old Town is mostly blue, the highest level.) --Hegvald (talk) 15:00, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- The article is a bit thin, but its significant in the history of Swedish healthcare.Rathfelder (talk) 22:02, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Needs many better sources, but it would seem notable. An article in the Nationalencyklopedin would make it notable. May want to look into medical journals, a quick search on Google Scholar provides at least 10 pages of articles. Seems to be heavily involved in research. Oaktree b (talk) 01:52, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep While the article is currently in bad shape, the article in the Swedish national encyclopedia clearly shows that it is a notable institution. Examples of additional sources (in Swedish): [4], [5], [6]. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 22:23, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.