Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecko Manufacturing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:07, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ecko Manufacturing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article lacks reliable third party sources and it appears to fail the Organization notability guidelines. Alpha Quadrant ^talk 23:46, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect To Ecko Unlimited. Truthsort (talk) 23:54, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 17:00, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 17:00, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Redirect - my preference would be a redirect to Mark Ecko who at least does have some significant coverage, for example [1]. The Ecko Unlimited link is a redirect to Eckō, which is basically unsourced and should probably also be redirected to Mark Ecko. --MelanieN (talk) 21:16, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Just another brand with a "sex sells" advertising campaign, fails WP:CORP. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 13:27, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.