Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egyptian conquest of Tunisia and Tripoli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:36, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Egyptian conquest of Tunisia and Tripoli

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is a POVFORK and a work of fiction. it is already established in our article Abd al-Wahid Zakariya ibn al-Lihyani that this caliph took power with Egyptian support. This is not controversial. However I can find exactly zero sources discussing a non existent “Egyptian invasion of Tunisia and Tripoli.” That is a piece of authorial invention. Mccapra (talk) 02:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Egypt, and Tunisia. Mccapra (talk) 02:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Algeria, and Libya. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:22, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The article is clearly trying to present Al-Lihyani's use of Egyptian soldiers as an "Egyptian conquest". ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 04:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
But Al-Lihyani was under An-Nasir's influence after helping him and the Egyptian troops fought against Abu Al-Baqa forces so isn't that considered a conquest? if not then just change the title of the article, I see no need to delete. 18Carlox32 (talk) 12:48, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Clearly a POVFORK. Per AirshipJungleman29 too. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 12:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Toadette ^{(Happy holiday!)} 07:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Srnec (talk) 01:41, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.