Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ela Darling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Deor (talk) 16:55, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ela Darling

Does not meet WP:GNG, doesn't appear notable as an entrepreneur. --NL19931993 (talk) 02:23, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 02:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 02:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 02:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 02:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 02:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - meets WP:GNG. A piece just on her in the Rolling Stone? Significant mentions in the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal? Yeah, that's significant coverage. --Nat Gertler (talk) 04:06, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:30, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete one article in one magazine does not notability make. There is not broad enough coverage to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:08, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Clear that nominator did not do WP:BEFORE given the Rolling Stones article mentioned by NatGertler, NY Times article [2], Wall Street Journal [3], and VICE article [4] that are already cited in the article. If you can't read the articles because of the paywall, try clearing your cookies. It is also clear that she passes WP:ENTERTAINER and WP:ARTIST, as a pioneer in VR porn, consistently cited in those articles. Look at this specific quote, "As the first ever VR Cam Girl, Darling’s ambitions of bringing VR pornography to the masses is truly passion fueled and is a demonstration of “roll up your sleeves” American entrepreneurship. Darling has built her own stereoscopic camera solution with stitching software and plans to offer it at a low entry price of $250, to allow easy access to cam girls who wish to enter into the market. The repercussions of this will be felt throughout the entire VR community: a steady stream of on-demand and fresh content. It’s one of the biggest complaints about VR so far, and porn seems to have a solution." [5] Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:37, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources. Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:10, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep ,i found only 2 sources that are reliable ,the rest are debatable ,qualifies for WP:HEY Georgiamarlins (talk) 19:58, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NCREATIVE (see here, here, etc). It is erroneous to assess the article's subject on the basis of criteria for porn entertainers: She's notable as an innovator in entertainment communication. The lead section of the article should also reflect this fact, and clearly too. -The Gnome (talk) 20:58, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep it meets gng as an entertainer but depend upon her career it is too soon.. Wikipedia:The GNG and notability for actors (may be applicable for actress). Rocky 734 (talk) 05:33, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.