Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmy Songz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:20, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Emmy Songz

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. The sources in the article are primarily interviews and are not independent of him. The page creator is a sock of User:Coal Press Nation. He currently has an open SPI case. The page creator created this particular article about himself, violating WP:COI. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 15:28, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 15:28, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 15:28, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 15:28, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A quick Google search revealed no reliable sources to support notability. Perhaps additional print sources or sources under the subject's birth name might reveal, but I'm not that invested in this AfD. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:41, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. Non notable musician. Ceethekreator (talk) 22:18, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Subject is notable as a public relation and also as an entrepreneur. He passes WP:ANYBIO and WP:ENT. He has made innovative contributions to the entertainment field according to the publication made by New Telegraph [1]. He clearly fails WP:MUSICBIO and would be a case of WP:TOOSOON if we where to look at the subject as a musical artist which he currently just started few months ago even if he had a number 1 song on iTunes chart he still fails WP:MUSICBIO but passes WP:GNG having received significant coverage on Tush Magazine [2]. He has been subject on The Punch [3] and Leadership [4].--Goodie9696 (talk) 17:47, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. User:Goodie9696 is a sock puppet of User:Coal Press Nation and the page creator of this article. He currently has an open SPI case. He violated Wikipedia's COI policy by creating this article. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 08:18, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Is this some type of campaigning @Versace1608, cause I don't understand why you have to leave a message on my talk page and still kept on emphasizing on this. Let me state my mission on Wikipedia, I am here to contribute to the Alté community by writing more articles about anyone involved in this soundcloud genre that became mainstream in Nigeria. Am still going to create more article's on "Tems", "Prettyboy D-O", "Show Dem Camp", "AYLØ", "Tomi Agape", "GMK", "BOJ", "Dami Oniru" and the list goes on. I came across this brand "Emmy Songz" after his alté pop single "Konnect" topped chart and having The Punch interview him about the success of the song. Which got me interested in this brand and also he was topping Teni song case on chart and that got my attention wanting to write about him but the press where coming in slow so I had to keep the article why I had my eyes out looking for more press why it was on my draft till It was enough to establish notability. I don't understand where you driving to or what you trying to clarify cause to what I have put together is enough to establish an article independent of the subject.--Goodie9696 (talk) 22:33, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete What versace says +. Can this also be salted, article has been recreated multiple times without significant improvement in notability. Mahveotm (talk) 19:23, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.