Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evan Luthra
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:13, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Evan Luthra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nominating on behalf of an IP user, their reasoning follows. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:49, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
"Non-notable person, non-notable sources and has had previous articles continually deleted for non-notable sources. Paid also for this wiki article 5:20 am, Today" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.21.43 (talk • contribs)
- Delete I have had this speedily deleted before. Fails WP:GNG. "involved in the blockhchain and cryptocurrency space" - that should tell you enough. Promotional spam. Edwardx (talk) 00:56, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:40, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:40, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - if it has been speedy deleted before, could it do so again? I see no notability here Spiderone 13:16, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- Unsure - the references currently visible in the article doesn't seem notable but a quick Google search shows coverage from Forbes, CoinTelegraph, The New Indian Express, Digital Journal, International Business Times, and few more. Maybe the draft needs to be revised. What say? Csgir (talk)
- Delete Mostly paid pieces provided as sources. This is a WP:ADMASK ShunDream (talk) 21:49, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --1l2l3k (talk) 21:27, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
- Weak Delete. The Digital Journal reference is about the Aargos and not its creator; New Indian Express has an article about Almora and not its co-founder; and the CoinTelegraph is not a source that carries much weight. The rest are mostly primary sources. We have only a couple of reliable sources with something dedicated to the subject: Forbes (here) and International Business Times (here). In short, this is too lame yet. -The Gnome (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete some references on google news search are reliable but the coverage isn't significant. Whereas if the coverage is significant it's either interview or a press release. I think it should be deleted as of now, may be in future we can get some solid sources (which I think we will get). Dial911 (talk) 17:56, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.