Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ewa Pacuła

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. SarahStierch (talk) 02:14, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ewa Pacuła (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I prodded this a while ago, the prod has now expired and the article coudl be deleted... but after second thought I think a wider discussion may be helpful. As written, the article no reliable sources (Polish wiki is somewhat better, but they are primarily work pages), and I am unable to find any easily (most of what I find seems celebrity/fashion gossip which seems somewhat better than blogs but it is too far from my usual areas of expertise for me to easily judge reliability). However, the person is a minor media personality (talk show host and such on notable Polish TV channels). And I am not sure how WP:PORNBIO would play into the fact that she was a (Polish) Playboy model. Thoughts? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:12, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:32, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:32, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:32, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:32, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.