Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FS Passengers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus because we don't know if this is spam or one of the most wonderful sim games ever. Gwen Gale (talk) 21:03, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FS Passengers

I nominate this article for deletion as follows:

Notability: Article fails to establish notability in that notability requires objective evidence. I have researched the article and been unable to find any objective evidence establishing notability.
Verifiable sources: reliable sources in objective, independent media. The only verifable source on the article page, is one that will suffer link death and is commercial in nature.
Spam: I made some minor changes to the articles wording, but I still feel the article (and the links provided to reviews and such like) make the article appear like an advertisement for the product, and given the lack of verifable references I do not believe this could be improved.
I proposed deletion of this page on 14 April 2008, and it was contested to allow time for the article to be improved.

Icemotoboy (talk) 22:22, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 01:26, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep or perhaps merge to some article which bundles together several of the Flight Simulator add-ons. Generally, I am a bit skeptical to articles on add-on software, but still there are some things going for this article. The Simradar review and others are at least independent, though I am not in much of a position to judge their reliability, and a look at Google indicates that the program is subject to a lot of interest from forums, so I can believe that a reader might be interested in such material. Link death of websites is not too big a worry since the Internet Archive seems to be retaining these pages [1]. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:08, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.