Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faisal Butt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 02:45, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Faisal Butt

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, all secondary sources I found seem like either routine news updates or low-quality promotional of the VC firm and not about him specifically. It is possible there is a needle in that haystack but I doubt it. (Note for Google News searchers: There is at least one other person with the same name in the news, so you will need to narrow the search.) Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:06, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete strong support; it should have honestly been removed through CSD under A7 Ppt91 (talk) 02:16, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Promo, unsourced, and looks like it was lifted from a company profile. No sources found for this person. Oaktree b (talk) 04:15, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and United Kingdom. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:48, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Probably eligible for G11.-KH-1 (talk) 01:31, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment- shocked it stayed on article space for this Long without no source. I tried clearing my doubt to search about him and I saw this [1][2][3], he looks like a prospects but not there yet . A soft delete looks ideal.Epcc12345 (talk) 07:14, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and WP:SALT. Completely unsourced WP:BLP. Almsot certainly WP:SPAM. Everyone knows in 2023 that not a free web host. We have to deter private individuals from abusing and using our charitable status, or the IRS could revoke our 501 (c) (3) status. Bearian (talk) 20:12, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.