Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filip Borowski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Happy to restore to draft if requested. Fenix down (talk) 18:36, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! Borowski has now appeared in I liga, therefore meeting the WP:NFOOTBALL criteria. Would it be possible to restore the page to draft? Take care! KibolLP (talk) 15:44, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for editing this page - tried reaching out through your Talk page, but the message was deleted without reply. KibolLP (talk) 15:46, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Filip Borowski

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was sent to draft on a WP:TOOSOON basis and appears to have been prematurely moved back. Still doesn't pass WP:NFOOTBALL as his cup games against Garbarnia Kraków and Znicz Pruszków do not count as, in both cases, the opposition team was playing in the II liga, which is not listed at WP:FPL. Aside from that, he gets a lot of Google News hits but none of these articles actually seem to address Borowski in any great detail. Similar lack of detailed coverage in a Polish source search. None of the current references seem to demonstrate WP:GNG either. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:41, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:41, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:41, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:41, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:42, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~Comment~~ - Obviously, it is still WP:TOOSOON. Can it go back to WP:DRAFTIFY?--dashiellx (talk) 18:37, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 21:20, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Hi, I would be fine with this article being deleted - I was surprised to see it accepted in the first place. Apologies for creating it too soon, I was not fully aware of the relevance rules when submitting it for review. Take care everyone. - KibolLP (talk) 10:43, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

KibolLP no worries, our notability criteria can certainly be confusing at times. FYI you are more than welcome to maintain these sorts of things in your own user space or draft space (e.g. at User:KibolLP/Filip Borowski) if you are worried about losing your work, otherwise, you can always ask an admin to restore at a later date if and when Borowski becomes notable. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:02, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per Nom - dashiellx (talk) 12:53, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.