Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FreeUsables Network
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:17, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- FreeUsables Network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Although presumably a good cause the following article does not appeat to show notability. Alex 13:14, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete no assertion of notability (incidently, new nominations should go at the bottom of the page) JCO312 14:46, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete I can certainly see, even without knowing the policy iy is non-notable. Retiono Virginian 18:35, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Non-notable website --Amxitsa 18:50, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete and Snowball - Can't see how this can be notable. Virtually no sources, No proff that it has had wide spread coverage and the fact that it barly ranks on teh search engines proves this. Æon Insanity Now! 20:13, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom as non-notable website. Comment on posts who said "speedy delete": Speedy deletion is only available if the article was created within 48 hours. Bigtop 23:14, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I probably have missed it, but you could please point me to the policy or guideline which states that Speedy only is acceptable for articles created within the last 48 hours? I can't find it on the general deletion or Speedy policy pages... Fram 14:04, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no obvious assertion of notability. ~ Arjun 00:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sources, no evience of notability. Sorry, freeusables is not usefull here! FirefoxMan 20:19, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.