Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GCatholic.org

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ST47 (talk) 21:06, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GCatholic.org

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

GCatholic.org (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although the site is a common source for Bishop and Diocese-related articles here on Wikipedia, I wasn't able to estabilish WP:NOTABILITY of the subject from a swift Internet search alone, and the article currently presents inappropriate sources for determining such, one being an Alexa page and the other citing the website directly. Alternatively, a redirect to Salt + Light Television is possible, of which the site's creator seems to work for. Game Is (presumably) Wikipedian (tea?) 20:59, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Game Is (presumably) Wikipedian (tea?) 20:59, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Game Is (presumably) Wikipedian (tea?) 20:59, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Notability in question. fails WP:WEB. CleanAmbassy (talk) 02:05, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: needs some sourcing that it is used as a reference by news sources and authors. Linked to quite a few wikipedia English pages (~2500). Better to redirect if decided. 14:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  • seems to be one of the top sources for info on Catholic bishops and dioceses used in various wikipedias
Comment Wikipedia is not a WP:RS. If there are sources that establish notability, they should be added to the article — Ad Meliora Talk∕Contribs 15:51, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I did not mean to list the links as support for notability just that it is used as a reliable source by numerous wikiprojects. The fact that it is used by numerous newspapers as a reliable source adds to its notability (there are books that use it as well). I kind of look at it like a newspaper (where many of the smaller newspapers have no citations supporting their notability but numerous wikilinks as they are used as a reliable source). Anyhow, I would prefer to redirect it rather than delete it and then maybe add a little to the author's mention so people can get at least a little idea of the source. anyhow, I put a note on the wikiproject Catholicism page maybe someone has some more input or sources. Patapsco913 (talk) 16:49, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/GCatholic.org&oldid=985083277"