Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gene Fisher

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:24, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gene Fisher

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. He won two small tournaments many years ago. Reliable sources have not written about him and thus by definition he is not notable. Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 05:24, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 June 28. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:41, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. Another inappropriate nomination. The "two small tournaments" are two World Series of Poker championships, and Yahoo Sports for one is a source to sustain notability. 2005 (talk) 06:31, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"championships" -- I guess it is you who added that word to all of these articles. They are called bracelets, not championships. Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 06:48, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:34, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:34, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 15:20, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Winner of multiple World Series of Poker bracelets? He's notable per WP:POKER. - Dravecky (talk) 15:34, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.