Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goinedit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 10:07, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Goinedit

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Utterly non-notable software product with zero relevant hits on Google. Fails WP:N, WP:RS, WP:SPAM}} andy (talk) 11:21, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree that if fails to meet basic notability (as far as I can see) Chzz ► 14:54, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is no evidence or documentation of its notability. -HeartSWild (talk) 16:35, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete advert with no attempt to establish notability TEDickey (talk) 10:11, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and Improve this article is not written like an advertisement yet, found some secondary-sources in python.org and texteditors.org 17:14, 27 January 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.37.8.43 (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.