Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Spot, Arizona

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:25, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Green Spot, Arizona

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have no idea what the deprod claim "doesn't have to be per geographic guidelines" is supposed to mean.... My prod said "No evidence found this is a notable populated place Not a community" and yeah, there actually does have to be evidence this is or was an actual recognized community to be notable! 1968 topo shows a well and a corral so this was a random ranch as the GMap suggests; the only newspapers.com results are for Green Spot brand Orange-Ade and a tree nursery. Reywas92^Talk 02:36, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Reywas92^Talk 02:36, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Reywas92^Talk 02:36, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the nominator's carefully researched rationale. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Lightburst (talk) 02:55, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
leaning delete I've been fairly sloppy in taking buildings as evidence of a settlement, but what I see here is mostly consistent with this being no more than a ranch. Mangoe (talk) 21:52, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not every two buildings built close are notable. By that definition I should be able to create an article on Eastlawn village north of Kercheval, Detroit, that distinct place, seperated by significant open land from elsewhere, has actual people.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.