Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grizraz Hearteater

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As the only substantial contributor supports deletion and no one else has supported retention, this seems to meet speedy deletion criterion G7. Josh Milburn (talk) 19:41, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grizraz Hearteater

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This character article fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 21:14, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Completely agree. I think I created this page years ago when I didn't understand notability guidelines. I would say move any relevant content to Tailchaser's Song, but there's not much that merits moving. The reference to Orpheus and Eurydice is interesting but probably original research - there isn't that much of a parallel anyway. Nat2 (talk) 00:22, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 21:18, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.