Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guildford bus station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:59, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Guildford bus station

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:LOCAL Laun chba ller 01:18, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - You may aswell say every bus station on this entire 'pedia fails "LOCAL" in that respect ... Admittingly it needs work doing but personally I see no reason other than WP:IDONTLIKEIT. –Davey2010 • (talk) 03:04, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Davey2010. Also WP:LOCAL is just an essay not policy, so deletion rationale needs expansion. Keresaspa (talk) 03:21, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that bus stations are inherently non-notable because they do not attract national/non-routine attention and, thus, fail WP:GNG. Even West Croydon bus station, which having been to both I consider to be bigger and, due to its proximity to a tube station, more important, has a section of a larger article. Crawley bus station, Horsham bus station and Redhill bus station are all redlinks.--Laun chba ller 09:43, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - bus stops are not notable, but bus stations can be. Bearian (talk) 17:46, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. If all railway stations are notable (and we consider that they are), then I think it's reasonable that all bus stations are also notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:43, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.