Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harasimowicze-Kolonia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Harasimowicze. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 13:50, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Harasimowicze-Kolonia

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Czarnorzeczka‎ in that it is a subunit of Gmina Dąbrowa Białostocka that is independent, but has nearly no sourceable information (population, etc.) to speak of. The only difference is that it is a sołectwo and has a sołtys and a council. However, I think this information is better suited for a table on the gmina's page (with the other sołectwa) per WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOPAGE. Ilawa-Kataka (talk) 01:33, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Poland. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:08, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Gmina Dąbrowa Białostocka if as suggested in the nomination it is better linked to a table there. There appears to be little content available to support a separate article. Rupples (talk) 09:04, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Rupples I have created that table now Gmina Dąbrowa Białostocka#Sołectwa. Ilawa-Kataka (talk) 15:39, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Also, the official spelling has no hyphen. Ilawa-Kataka (talk) 15:41, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:04, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Harasimowicze, of which this is a part of. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:43, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: We have two different Redirect target articles suggested and we need to get that down to one.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:41, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concur with Piotrus regarding redirect to Harasimowicze (part of, and local, makes much more sense in terms of any sort of searching). --Ouro (blah blah) 12:02, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.