Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hatchford Brook tram stop

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:05, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hatchford Brook tram stop

With a space or with full quotes there's no off-wiki indication that this proposed tram stop exists in discussion, let alone is a notable tram stop. There doesn't appear to be mention of it in the official discussion of the expansion.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. —_{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 15:43, 3 June 2008 (UTC) _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 15:43, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable in any way and I doubt the tram line will be built, certainly not in this decade. It seems to be all on hold. This is probably just taken from here Midland Metro route maps -- which in turn is taken from Midland Metro. The Midland Metro route maps article should also be deleted, is there a way to include it with this or do I or someone else just raise another AfD for it? Doug Weller (talk) 16:33, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The Midland Metro Line 1 is in operation, so that it is legitimate to have an article dealing with that, but articles on tramstops on other lines are inappropriate and should be deleted for the moment, being left as redirects to articles on the area where it is said they will be. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:18, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The Midland Metro is a light railway, rather more than a traditional tram system, so that the use of the word "railway" in a tag is appropriate. It might conceivably be approporaite to have an article on the whole suggested line, but as far as I am aware all the lines except line 1 (which is in operation) are mere proposals. Line 2 (Tipton to Brierly Hill) has had a public enquiry, but has not been funded. The rest are mere ideas in planners' minds. This article thus fails WP:Crystal, as would any others on proposed Metro lines. Where the stops will be is something likely to be determined at the public enquiry. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:13, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.