Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heather Zurich

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The consensus among editors in this discussion is to Keep this article. But that situation might change depending on whether or not there are copyright violations found in this article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:03, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Heather Zurich

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 06:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Basketball. Joeykai (talk) 06:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and New Jersey. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:18, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:GNG with the sources now in the article. I've cleaned it up considerably. Alvaldi (talk) 12:49, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As expanded by Alvaldi, the article provides ample in-depth reliable and verifiable sources to demonstrate that the notability standard is satisfied. Alansohn (talk) 13:06, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - enough coverage to meet GNG. Rlendog (talk) 14:20, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I put great effort into creating accurate and complete information. Thank you Alvaldi for the cleanup, I'm not a regular Wikipedia contributor. Jrnhoops (talk) 15:56, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - valid sources, meets WP:GNG. JojoMN1987 (talk) 15:26, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. In addition to the extremely excessive detail, this page has some serious copyvio (a bunch of the prose outside the quotes is unattributed copy-paste from the sources) and probably should be TNT'd. JoelleJay (talk) 22:32, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.