Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holyman House

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was ‎ nomination withdrawn. Graham87 (talk) 02:09, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Holyman House

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It exists and has some mentions in sources, but I couldn't establish that it meets WP:N. Boleyn (talk) 12:05, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

comment: Here’s a source that I found that seems to establish WP:N:

[[1]]. AriTheHorse 14:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Aviation, Transportation, and Australia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:51, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep - it could have deserved a speedy keep if some attention had been made to https://trove.nla.gov.au/search?keyword=holyman%20house%20launceston, it seems the nature of the find sources might not have the capacity to raise the trove items.JarrahTree 00:19, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep – article now meets WP:N for WP:BUILDING as much well-referenced detail has been added since the nomination was made. --Oronsay (talk) 03:33, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Remove nomination per comments above. Thanks for proving me wrong, Boleyn (talk) 16:26, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.