Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Home (2016 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draft. About half the people said userfy, but nobody has stepped up to own it, so I'm just going to move this to draft space Draft:Home (2016 film). -- RoySmith (talk) 21:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Home (2016 film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable film. Fails WP:GNG. Koala15 (talk) 22:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 22:55, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 23:17, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

director:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

studio:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

star:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Soft delete or Userfy. Apparently complete but not-yet-released, this topic is simply TOO SOON. Article can always be resurrected when we have confirmation of release. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 01:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now at best until a better article is available. SwisterTwister talk 02:39, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clearly a case of WP:TOOSOON. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy- Movie is notable but it is WP:TOOSOON, definitely it deserves a page. It will be better to userfy than delete at this moment. Amitbanerji26 (talk) 15:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Userfy per Sir Michael. @Amitbanerji26:; what do you mean by "Movie is notable but it is WP:TOOSOON"? Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 18:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.