Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyper Agency

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:53, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hyper Agency

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Non-notable organisation, fails WP:ORG, no independent references, contested prod. WWGB (talk) 12:11, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Also unambiguous advertising. No showing of historical, technical, or cultural significance: a live entertainment agency based in Notting Hill, London. Hyper Agency is a booking agent for DJ's and Celebrities. Hyper Agency offer representation for acts throughout the UK and Worldwide booking bars, nightclubs, personal appearances, television and corporate entertainment. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:17, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete since I can't even see any claims of notability. Definitely breaks WP:ARTSPAM. Jonobennett (talk) 15:23, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Claiming to represent David Hasselhoff might be a minimal claim of importance. I mean, David Hasselhoff! - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:46, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - The problem is, of course, is that it's a claim. Moreover, it's the sort of claim that organizations like have been known to fraudulently make, or exaggerate. Uncle G (talk) 16:04, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I couldn't find anything documenting this organization in depth, either. There's nothing independently verifying that this organization, known to the world only via a WWW site, is as it is claimed. Uncle G (talk) 16:04, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.