Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jared Jeffrey (4th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:16, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jared Jeffrey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

G4 speedy declined without comment by someone other than the article creator - last AFD was closed as Delete. If there is merit to keep this after three AFDs then fine, but there should be a discussion as to whether the subject meets WP:ATHLETE or WP:GNG. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 23:52, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The speedy was removed because he is currently playing in an MLS match. I just saw it before the match and created the article. Source: [1]. Cheers. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 00:08, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per ArsenalFan700. – Michael (talk) 01:03, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This article shouldn't even be nominated for deletion, since this is professional player who already played in a fully professional league.--SirEdimon (talk) 01:14, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I have now added a source on the page itself now. Also I will take blame for this as I should have just added the source when I created the page just to show he was in the line-up. Cheers. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 01:30, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Now passes WP:NFOOTY.--Egghead06 (talk) 01:41, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - based on the above, I'd advise the nominator to re-consider this nomination. Giant Snowman 10:40, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:34, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem withdrawing the nomination at this point, after 4 AFDs I think there is finally merit for inclusion. If anyone wants to close, I'm all for it. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:41, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This article was deleted because it failed WP:GNG about six months ago. I can't see how playing 79 minutes of a match makes any change to that, and since the subject still fails GNG the article should be deleted. Mentoz86 (talk) 18:43, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But... that would require me to actually put effort into the article so it passes GNG. I mean, I can do it, but do I want to? Hm... --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 19:03, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you can't see how playing in a fully professional league doesn't "make any change to that", then you need to re-read the appropriate notability standards. Here's a {{minnow}} to plip you in their direction. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:41, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - sigh, I was just about to close this as "nomination withdrawn" but I can't when there are valid 'delete' !votes...however, this player has made his professional debut and passes WP:NFOOTBALL, the clock for GNG should therefore start now. Giant Snowman 18:51, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:NFOOTY as has played in a fully pro league namely the MLS. Finnegas (talk) 21:40, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and snow close - meets the notability standards as he has played in a fully professional match. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:41, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.