Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasem Soltani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. With socks being struck, it seems clear that there is consensus to delete amongst editors in good standing. No significant sources presented in nearly three weeks of discussion. Happy to close this as delete now with no realistic chance of s change in consensus. Fenix down (talk) 23:48, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jasem Soltani

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Futsal player who fails GNG, NFOOTY and NSPORTS. Sources coverage is typical sports career routine and then death from Covid, which isn't notable either. BlameRuiner (talk) 07:33, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep appears to be enough coverage of his death to meet WP:GNG. NemesisAT (talk) 10:05, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Sennecaster (Chat) 12:11, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sennecaster (Chat) 12:11, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Sennecaster (Chat) 12:11, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Despite the multiple references for his death, only one is even remotely significant enough to contribute to GNG, and even that relies almost entirely on primary, non-independent quotes from people who knew him rather than independent analysis by a secondary party. Even if there was more coverage, deaths count towards BLP1E in the absence of later, extended discussions. JoelleJay (talk) 17:39, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: the footballer's input is remarkable since his work in the sports world is correctly narrated supported by reliable and independent sources. Nasty bits (talk) 17:54, 28 October 2021 (UTC) Struck sock JoelleJay (talk) 14:19, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:49, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 09:24, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:14, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - agree with JoelleJay. Fails WP:GNG. Paul Vaurie (talk) 04:05, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no indication that the subject meets GNG.--Alireza Khabib (talk) 03:13, 9 November 2021 (UTC) struck confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 01:15, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 14:58, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Joelle's assessment of available sourcing Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:08, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.