Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johannes Reich-Rohrwig

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:17, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Johannes Reich-Rohrwig

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:DEL#REASON

WP:NOTPROMO

WP:NOTRESUME

Article reads promotionally; a single editor with no other pages edited has contributed nearly the entire article. Xnyarla (talk) 23:16, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Xnyarla (talk) 23:16, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Subject may have published a lot, but nobody seems to have noted it. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:32, 24 December 2023 (UTC).[reply]
Delete, reads entirely like a resume which wikipedia is not and with an excessive amount of WP:REFSPAM which does nothing to assert notability of the subject. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:58, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Law, and Austria. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:01, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Most sources are court decisions, which you would expect for a lawyer, but aren't acceptable sourcing. Nothing found for this person either. Oaktree b (talk) 02:31, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: doesn't demonstrate N microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 16:54, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.