Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Askill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Missvain (talk) 15:31, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan Askill

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. The only in-depth source in the article or elsewhere is an interview, which does not really count. Edwardx (talk) 17:08, 28 November 2020 (UTC) Edwardx (talk) 17:08, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:22, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:22, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:22, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete interviews do not add towards passing GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:35, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - There actually does seem to be more in-depth coverage of Askill's work that is not sourced in the article, e.g. Grazia article, article about Topshop's collaboration with him, etc. Combined with the awards Askill has received it does seem that he has quite a bit of notability. It's hard to find good articles on fashion designers through Google searches because the coverage is interspersed with advertising. John Pack Lambert's contribution should be ignored because he has done no research and his contribution is not helpful. Deus et lex (talk) 11:05, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:36, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep, some notability, a few awards and a part in an exhibition in a major museum. Kolma8 (talk) 08:17, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There seems to be enough good coverage such as Vogue and WSJ. A google news search brought up many more, such as GQ, People. and ELLE. There is actually over 10 pages of google news results for his name. I will try to add these sources and improve article. Peter303x (talk) 21:12, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I agree with @Peter303x:. Enough good coverage. Seems to be within WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 14:28, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.