Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joy-Ann Biscette

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz talk 01:17, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Joy-Ann Biscette (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 10:15, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 04:51, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 04:51, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 19:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I know notability is not inherited. The Banner talk 17:40, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170etalk 17:29, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The subject is a national-level winner who participated in one of the Big Four international competition. As for the earlier suggestion that the subject fails to meet WP:NMODEL, it isn't clear why that would be a relevant criterion for assessing someone who participates in an international competition. Also, the nomination was based on a lack of sources, but sources have been found and now appear in the article. NewYorkActuary (talk) 18:01, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.