Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathleen Murphy (Illinois politician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:43, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kathleen Murphy (Illinois politician)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 05:11, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Politicians. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 05:11, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, and the article is very lacking in general. Liliana ^(UwU) 05:14, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, while minor in notablity i believe it still does meet notability.— Preceding unsigned comment added by TypicalJeww (talk • contribs) — TypicalJeww (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Illinois. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:09, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, an also-ran for Lieutenant Governor and not running for anything since. Can't see any significant coverage in RS, just the routine local coverage you'd expect for any candidate in a US state election. Storchy (talk) 11:20, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Failed politicians do not meet WP:NPOL. Bkissin (talk) 14:58, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom. I searched and couldn't find any non-routine reliable secondary sourcing that would satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Sal2100 (talk) 19:38, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for running as candidates in elections they didn't win, but this article doesn't even attempt to claim that she has other notability claims for other reasons besides that. Bearcat (talk) 16:51, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.