Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Martin (broadcaster)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Expansion of the article has addressed the concerns in the nomination statement. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:19, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keith Martin (broadcaster)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fifteen years without a reliable source for a subject with a thin claim to notability in the first place is more than enough. BD2412 T 05:04, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. BD2412 T 05:04, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:59, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:59, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:59, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Comment~~ Keep There are a number of WP:RS books which provide coverage of what very much appears to be a pioneering role in the development of UK pirate radio. I have added several of these references to the article. Furthermore the source show Martin also appears to have a prolific broadcasting career consistent with WP:ENT ResonantDis_tortion 21:23, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The main reason for wanting this article deleted was a lack of independent references. These have now been provided so there is now no reason for this article to be deleted. Rillington (talk) 11:05, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.