Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lesta Studio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawing my nomination now. Enough sources were found to keep it. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 16:08, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lesta Studio

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP for lack of significant coverage from secondary reliable sources. Has issues since 2010. Nothing to be found on my search, and the article has IMDB and primary references. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 13:14, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:19, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:20, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:20, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:20, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:21, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We need more Russian speakers to hang around. In English resources, there's press releases and a few articles on their games; here's a video article from IGN. It looks like a few dozen hits also for Google Books but mostly about their games. Igromania however has a detailed report on their 26th birthday and I'd be willing to bet there are other Russian sources out there, and that was mostly just from a survey of the video games sources (mostly in English)--I suspect given their involvement outside of video games, and the age of their company, they might be found in American or Russian sources outside that domain. This isn't a keep, but it's not a delete for me either. --Izno (talk) 17:04, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:11, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per the sources identified by Izno seems to just about clear WP:GNG barely Atlantic306 (talk) 22:42, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:49, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment While I will admit the Igromania reference is a very good one here, I think that at best this should be merged into World of Warships. The coverage it got is exactly because of that and I just don't think there is enough to build a separate article for it. Will try to look into Russian sources to add. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:56, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and fix. Although bearly, the company is notable as identified by three in-depth sources, which should be added to the article. Two are the one's listed by Izno, and Kotaku UK has a lengthy feature in English as well. Lordtobi (✉) 13:37, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.