Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lila Turjanski-Villard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:06, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lila Turjanski-Villard

No assertion of notability, and no references other than own website. A google search [1] returns only one result which only states contact info. A^RendedWinter 22:10, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete probable vanity bio. Non-notable in any case. The only thing I found was a showing (with other artists) in New York, which isn't even mentioned in the article, whose claims are, thus, impossible to verify.--Sethacus 22:23, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete... non notable self promotion only one entry on Google Teapotgeorge 14:05, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Teapotgeorge. Stifle (talk) 20:11, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Lila Turjanski-Villard is an emerging sculptor with very few references. The List of sculptors page does not mention that only renown sculptors are listed. If so, then I'll suggest either to create a Emerging artist page or to delete the entry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by YopYopYop (talk • contribs) 12:21, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as fails WP:N and WP:V and because of a total lack of third-party sources.--Vox puppet (talk • contribs) 06:42, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. —David Eppstein 07:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.