Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lindsay Japal (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss Universe 2012. MBisanz ^talk 00:33, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lindsay Japal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Japal is the only Miss Cayman Islands to have a seperate article. There is no good reason for this. The previous discussion closed as keep, but since then the rules for beauty pageant winners have been revisted. I think to keep this article we would want to see another reliable source cover her indepth besides the one in the article. John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:28, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Where did we revisit the rules? Not at the current RfC? Link? Montanabw^(talk) 07:47, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:44, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:44, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:44, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Miss Universe 2012 as a valid search term, and the subject is mentioned there. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:45, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now. Discussion about notability guidelines has already started on the Talk page for the Beauty Pageant project. No harm will be done by closing this nomination as "keep" and letting the project-level discussion take its course. Furthermore, I note that every Miss USA titleholder has a separate article, and the imposition of different, and more stringent, standards on titleholders from outside the United States is how systemic bias gets created. Finally, don't be misled by the nominator's declaration that the subject is the only Miss Cayman Islands to have a separate article. It isn't true. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:59, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 21:28, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:49, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect (after "Delete") to Miss Universe 2012. The discussion that has started has largely confirmed me experience with the articles on pageant winners, finding them to be WP:PSEUDO biographies on individuals only notable for WP:BIO1E. This redirect is an appropriate action in this case. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:02, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty Pageants-related deletion discussions. PageantUpdater (talk) 00:28, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.