Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Armenians

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-13 08:17Z

List of Armenians

This list has become a huge, useless, unverified, and unmaintainable list, and no one has shown any interest in properly maintaining it. As it has no useful purpose in its current form, delete. --Nlu (talk) 12:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spin off into separate articles - List of Armenian actors, List of Armenian artists etc. This would be easier to maintain, verify and use. Walton monarchist89 13:39, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Isn't this just better off as Category:Armenians? Shrumster 13:54, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, [[Category:Armenian people]] already exists. Perhaps the two can somehow be merged (if not already all people in the list are in the category) and (soft)redirected? --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 15:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete use the Category:Armenian people instead. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:43, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and replace with category. Hut 8.5 16:12, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep While I admit this list has gotten out of hand, I think we should keep it. I eliminated all latest additions that were red links. I find this list useful, just as useful as any other "List of x nationality". I am willing to pay more attention to the article so that no more damaging additions may be done. - Fedayee 22:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and cleanup - significantly improved and cut down by Fedayee since nominated for deletion. The list is maintainable, it just seems to have suffered from a lack of maintenance-directed attention for some time. In addition, the subcategories of Category:Armenian people are rather underpopulated. Splitting off into separate articles, per Walton monarchist89, sounds like a good idea once the list is cleaned up. Black Falcon 23:38, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It should be kept because it is very usefule article. The only problem is that it should be cleaned a little, so it would not get out of control with unverified informations added. ROOB323 00:10, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It looks fine now. Hakob 01:49, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Hakob. -- Davo88 02:13, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nareklm 23:47, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Armenia-related deletions. -- Black Falcon 23:44, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and sort out and for what its worth delete category armenian people for being redundent to the list! per Walton Monarchist Jcuk 19:08, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I can hardly see why THIS of all lists is an unmaintainable, unverified, huge list. Has anyone even seen lists like List of Jewish American musicians? If those can stay, there's no reason this one can't. Usedup 02:59, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep consitering we have plenty of other people by origin of birth.--Sefringle 06:09, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's a worthy and quite accurate article. The only development I'd consider is spinning off into separate articles, as it was suggested by Walton monarchist89. --Armatura 12:51, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.